Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) are the answer. However, recent research has shown 96%* of local authorities finding planning submissions for SuDS either inadequate or mixed. Often, token efforts such as a swale or pond are included within a development, to simply tick the SuDS box. To some extent, this is understandable. Developers are under pressure to deliver a greater number of new homes at a profit and a wider use of SuDS can reduce the number of homes that a site can support. There is also the question of who maintains SuDS going forward.
So, what do we do?
Around 25%* of local authorities still lack formal SuDS policies, suggesting a lack of understanding for this requirement and its importance to local residents and businesses. In England, we need to get our act together, following the example of Wales and Scotland and make it mandatory to have SuDS approving bodies to adopt SuDS under part 3 of the Flood and Water Management Act. At present, only around 2%* of SuDS are maintained by local authorities.
Government has a role to play, but so do we as both consumers and professionals.
During planning consultations for new homes, flood risk is becoming an increasing concern for local people. As consumers of new homes, we need to demand more of the developers in this area – the more we do, the more they will respond to the power of the consumer.
As professionals, we also need to help the developers to deliver affordable and appropriate SuDS schemes that allow them to achieve the margins they need, whilst protecting the local area.
With most things, there is no single solution, but collectively we need to recognise the importance and necessity of SuDS in preventing recurrences of the flooding that has affected so many people in recent years.
Story by Mark Jones, SuDS and Flood Risk Associate The LK group
*Landscape Institute and Construction Industry Council in the New Civil Engineer Magazine